Can war and tsunami evacuation be considered in the same line?
Where do you run away? (Kurotowa style)
Mr. Toru Hashimoto, a critic who often
makes noise in the situation in Ukraine.
Evacuation in war is likened to evacuation in the event of a disaster. Is this correct?
亡くなられた方々にはお悔やみ申し上げます。ただし一般市民は戦闘が始まりそうならまず避難。災害対策と同じです。戦うことだけに熱くなってはいけません。とにかく一刻でも早く一般市民が逃げる仕組みをとることです。逃げるのはダメ、戦わなければならないという雰囲気になることは絶対にダメです。 https://t.co/R0Cv9jM2yi
— 橋下徹 (@hashimoto_lo) April 4, 2022
"We would like to express our deepest sympathies to those who have died. However, the general public should evacuate first if the battle is about to begin. It is the same as disaster countermeasures. Don't get hot just to fight. Anyway, it is to take a mechanism for the general public to escape as soon as possible. You can't run away, you can't feel like you have to fight."— Toru Hashimoto (@hashimoto_lo) April 4, 2022
The thread that follows concludes, "If
you don't have the power to prevent a tsunami, you have to run away."
The decisive difference between war and tsunami is that the tsunami is unwilling and does not chase or surround people.
If Ukrainians try to escape, Russian troops may advance there or attack missiles.
You can't move very noticeably.
However, here, based on those differences, I will dare to try to think of them as equivalent.
Evacuation can be temporary, medium-term, or long-term.
Speaking of tsunami, "escape to high ground", "gather at evacuation shelters", "live in temporary housing" and so on.
If Mr. Hashimoto's criticism refers to any of these three things, I think it would be as follows when applied to the war.
"Protect yourself from bullets and blasts", "Gather in shelters", "Build barricades and fight thoroughly"
If Mr. Hashimoto refers to evacuation as an evacuation or fleeing to a neighboring town, it would not be appropriate to talk about the same kind of tsunami.
This is because many of the people who have been evacuated due to the tsunami have not left the prefecture or even their own town.
If you want to move to a place where there is no war, in terms of disaster, all Japanese must travel to Australia.
It is difficult and unrealistic to move people so much.
In the past, evacuation due to the Fukushima nuclear accident related to the tsunami reached a peak of about 160,000 people.
And there are more than 1000 related deaths that died from the stress of evacuation.
Even if you evacuate, people will die.
Even with reference to the Fukushima nuclear accident, the distance traveled is not as far as the safe area in Ukraine and the population, and there are missiles, so there is no confirmation of safety wherever you go.
In the event of a war, you have to escape from the enemy's siege.
If there are a large number of people and insufficient equipment, the damage will increase.
It will be fresh in our memory that the theater in Mariupol was hit by a missile and many people who had been evacuated there were killed.
Ukrainians are already evacuated in the best possible situation.
And even if you evacuate, you will be damaged.
So was the humanitarian corridor.
The counterattack against the Russian army is thought to be a means of delaying the advance of the Russian army physically and psychologically and extending the lives of the citizens.
The surrender of Japan and the surrender of Ukraine in World War II are in different positions. Ukraine's surrender differs Japan's surrender
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿