If Ukraine surrenders, it may be a tool for the next war crimes

Surrender is neither intact nor victim

Why Ukraine chose to fight

When Russia invaded Ukraine, I think it was an option to fight or surrender.

But for them, surrender would not have been possible.

Many nations have begun to support in response to their commitment to defending their territory, sovereignty and freedom in the fight.

In April, some Russian troops have begun to withdraw.

It also withdrew from the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv.

So far Ukraine's sovereignty has been preserved.

I saw this kind of exchange on Twitter.

戦争は他の手段による政治の継続である（クラウゼヴィッツ）
侵略者と戦わない国に、交渉なんかできない。チェチェンのようにプーチンの奴隷になるしかない。そういう戦争＝外交のきびしさは地方政治ではわからないだろうが、わからないことにはコメントしないほうがいい。 https://t.co/UbPLMk9jdD

— 池田信夫 (@ikedanob) April 2, 2022

"War is the continuation of politics by other means (Klausewitz)

You can't negotiate with a country that doesn't fight the invaders. There is no choice but to become Putin's slave like Chechnya. You may not know the severity of such war = diplomacy in local politics, but you should not comment on what you do not understand."— Nobuo Ikeda (@ikedanob) April 2, 2022

I don't know much about Nobuo Ikeda, but I get the impression that he is coherent.

Chechnya describes it as a slave, but it is probably a puppet government and irresistible to Russia.

The Chechen Republic is a country that actively participated in the invasion of Ukraine on the Russian side.

At the end of this war, Chechnya will be held responsible for the war with Russia.

If Ukraine had surrendered to Russia early, would Russia have stopped the invasion?

Perhaps they were using Ukraine for the next invasion.

Whether or not to fight in the choice of Ukraine is important.

And who you fight is also important.