Forex | Orli and JIN Trials | Which one can you trust?

Another battle for investors

At first I was trying to write a rating for Forex traders.

After all, investment is a matter of money itself, and there are people who fail and lose their lives.

Therefore, with the meaning of suppressing speech that induces investment to gambling, what kind of person would lose [binary options] before? The winning percentage of high and low is not 50%, isn't it? I wrote.

I don't have a deep knowledge of investment myself, so I can't evaluate investment advice. 

But I know this might be dangerous.

So, I was thinking of picking up some traders and evaluating their behavior.

The first candidates were my game bulletin JIN(Oreteki game sokuho JIN), Aki live investors(Aki Namahaishinsurutoshika), and Orli ch(Ohrii channeru).

There was no particular reason to raise these three people.

I only noticed it because they frequently send information on YouTube and Twitter.

However, while writing the blog, new information came out.

Did JIN and Orli have a trial?

Therefore, I would like to change the purpose of this blog a little and focus on JIN and Orli for evaluation.

A trial in which Orli sued JIN

A brief explanation of the content of the trial is that it begins in 2020 when Orli was slandered and Orli sued JIN.

The content of the accusation seems to be that JIN said that Orli is not really investing with his own funds, but that he is showing a demonstration.

In other words, JIN criticized the imagination that he was showing only successful cases to investors who could make money without any pain.

In addition to “Orli is a demonstrator, JIN also said that 100 million yen per blow was a lie, his seminars were useless, and that he was a fraudster.

The result of the ruling is that Orli submitted evidence that he was actually trading with money, and JIN apologized.

Orli briefly recalls the flow of the trial on his YouTube channel, but there is something strange about it.

"I wondered if he was saying that because it was proof that I was doing a demo trade, and when I proceeded with the trial, he said, 'If you are not a demo trader, give me proof.' It was an unprecedented development. "

continue,

"For some reason, the plaintiffs are giving more and more evidence."

Continue further,

"Usually, the defendant doesn't do 100 million yen per blow for this reason, your seminar is useless, and the evidence is valued in the trial."

Orli said so.

It seems to him that the plaintiffs should give evidence, but the actual trial is not always the case.

Since Orli is the plaintiffs, he has provided evidence that JIN has injured him.

And if JIN, who was accused of it, argues, he will give a reason why he doesn’t slander Orli.

That is, for example, a trade statement.

Here, Orli needs to show evidence to prove that he is innocent.

If that is not possible, JIN will have the upper hand.

This is the natural flow of a trial.

Orli described it as "unprecedented."

If he wasn't ignorant, he would be a little suspicious of lies.

Perhaps this was a revengeful feeling that Orli wanted JIN to have a slight image down.

Or maybe Orli want to emphasize the legitimacy of his self.

I know it's annoying to be called a scammer by JIN.

It may be frustrating that even though the trial was settled, all the trust and dignity lost by JIN's remarks will not come back.

However, the plaintiff is not absolutely justice in the trial.

It's true that JIN's words and actions are not good, but there may have been an element that Orli said so.

Trials are not poetic justice but are done to clarify each other's faults and compromise.

I don't know the details of the trial, but as far as I can see the video, I interpret that JIN was urged to reflect on this matter, and Orli was settled with the warmth that he would not pursue further.

However, I think JIN is superior to Orli in terms of creditworthiness as a trader.

There are about the following reasons for this.

Forex distributor creditworthiness

One is that Orli's advice is technical, and JIN's advice seems to be mostly money management.

In a recent video, Orli said that the dollar-yen surge was due to institutional investors buying dollars.

And the plunge is imminent as the yen is about to be repurchased.

However, that week, the dollar-yen pair surged to 125 yen.

Orli did not change his tone by saying that there is a rule that the beard of the chart can be ignored by returning to 121 yen after entering 125 yen.

After that, the dollar-yen pair moved to 128 yen, which was difficult for Orli's expectations.

In addition, the technical fragility that Orli advocated, "The amount obtained by subtracting the past rise in a straight line will be an indicator of the upper limit in the future, has collapsed.

However, I don't think that the fact that this prediction was wrong is not particularly blamed.

As various investors and experts predict, it's really hard to tell when it's going up or down.

In particular, the exchange rate fluctuations this time are so surprising that even those who expected the dollar-yen pair to rise are surprised at the sharp rise.

Still, it's part of their jobs, so they have to keep anticipating.

What made me doubt the credibility of Orli as "What?" was that I didn't mention any of the previous disappointing expectations in the next video.

“What? Is this another person?” As much as I think, he starts a new story.

Since it's his YouTube channel, I thought he should be okay to verify the past remarks a little more.

After that, after going up to 128 yen, he finally mentioned something that was a little unexpected, but my credit, which he did not mention at all at that time, does not come back.

It can't be helped to be unexpected, just why not scrutinize it.

I don't think anyone who chooses silent as a self-protection can be trusted as a caller.

I'm not saying that his humanity is not good.

It's just as an advisor.

However, the technical meaning and usage will be explained by the current foreign exchange, so in that respect it is good to refer to this.

He’s confident in what he says, so I'm worried that some beginners will swallow his words.

On the other hand, JIN sometimes displays technical as reference material, but I think that there is a lot of money management as advice.

As JIN's remark, it is better for those who started FX to adopt it.

• Leverage should be 5-8 as a guide,
• When making a profit, make a profit little by little,

(For example, if you have 10 dollar-yen buys and are on an upward trend, you will not make a profit at once, but make a profit for each yen rise. Then, even if you suddenly fall, you will be able to secure some profit. If it keeps rising, the profit margin can be further increased.)

• If you want to buy more or sell more from the unrealized loss, keep a moderate price range,

And so on.

You shouldn't imitate his accusation.

we don't know who his fan is and may lose our dear best friend.

And with regard to investment management, it is dangerous to say that a style that hardly loses a huge amount of funds vertically is also dangerous.

In that sense, it may be a dangerous investor.

But when it comes to who is putting investors at risk, especially beginners, I think Orli.

This is also unavoidable due to the difference in the delivery styles of the two.

While Orli sells as a complete advisor and tipster character, JIN has the same perspective as a viewer as a trader.

Therefore, it is no wonder that Orli has an incentive to hold a position and is exposed to criticism more often than just an influence on investment.

JIN's accusation was probably the flow of cursing from the viewer's point of view.

Is he a winner but known as a looser?

This time, Orli, who seems to have won the trial, does not necessarily say that it will have a positive effect on his work.

That is because he may have the impression that he is not allowed to criticize in general.

He complained of defamation, not a legitimate criticism, but it's difficult to draw a line.

Because it has trouble getting a trial, whether he wins or not.

If it is regarded as a person who should not be touched, it will lead to a decrease in the name of the distributor.

Also, JIN mentioned in the apology video, but it seems that Orli's name will not be mentioned in the future.

This will reduce the chances of getting to know Orli.

As Orli describes JIN's middle class as "bullying", it may seem absurd for the bad guys to win.

It's more credible with a trader who can actually make 100 million dollars, and it's quite possible that it will be an advantage.

However, as mentioned above, I feel that Orli's guidance is somewhat disregarding the self-judgment of the investor himself.

JIN is slandering other than Orli, but it seems to serve as a warning to Forex beginners.

From what I see, JIN is very vulgar, but he does not seem irresponsible to take away as much as he can with the membership fees found in other tipsters.

JIN is cautious about remarks that affect how the viewer holds the position.

It means that I can feel a conscience for the profit and loss of the viewer from him.

Therefore, my impression is that JIN can be trusted even if he has a bad mouth, and Orli is unreliable and stinking even though he is the victims.

I need someone who, rather than defending false accusation, talks about investing and criticizes all the sweet distributors of their guidance while influencing the judgment of the customer, not the investment itself.

That's why I defend it.

I don't think a 10-minute video can be enough to teach.

It just makes you feel like you know.

Actually, the amount of information in Orli's video is small.

The above-mentioned argument that institutional investors have made the dollar-yen surge sharp is part of it, and in reality, there are various aspects such as the rise in interest rates in the United States and the decline in purchasing motivation of the Japanese people, and institutional investors are also in the process. They are looking at buying and selling along with it.

Even if institutional investors buy a lot, it is difficult to predict when and how to return it without paying close attention to the world situation.

And with the recent rapid fluctuations, delivery once a week will not be enough.

It's not a bad thing to bring a trial.

But that still depends on the degree.

Wasn't it enough to exchange emails?

Couldn't you bring it to the settlement?

I would like Orli to tell us how that happened.

Was there justification, necessity, and urgency before the trial?

Is it enough to convince public opinion?

The false accusation equal trial may be heading towards the trend of the entertainment world these days, but if you swallow it, you will lose something more important.

And I hope JIN will continue to criticize without touching the law, with a little more thought about how to criticize.

*At a later date, according to JIN's remarks in his broadcast, the lawsuit ended in a settlement. In other words, because a judge appears in his story, it is possible that he was brought to court once or twice, but in the end, JIN was reluctant to go to court ("This is the only way to go to court. I'm sorry to the people involved."), so it can be said that he took the initiative and ended up with an apology and a settlement. In addition, it can be said that there was no settlement money from JIN's statement that he "did not pay even 1 yen" in his distribution.