Hyenas, vultures, news reports, YouTubers who die without mourning

Is it bad to get money for the death of a person?

YouTuber, a media that uses the death of a celebrity as content

When celebrities die, information will be exchanged all at once.

It will be the main content of wide shows every day on TV, and it will be the material of YouTuber on the net.

The agility of the mass media that is sent out in a blink of an eye after learning the obituary may look like a hyena that devours death in the savanna, and it is a vulture that YouTuber, which was completely unrelated, is delivering in memory of the deceased.

So is the site operation.

Some of them are not criticized depending on how they are taken up, but the question remains whether it is okay if they look good.

Probably because the subject is the death of a person.

The cause of death also depends on whether the cause of death is illness, accidental death, natural death, or suicide.

Of course, even if a celebrity disappears, it cannot be helped not to announce it at all.

"I haven't seen that person lately."

If it is rumored that he died later, it seems that the media will continue to overheat around the date of its announcement, just because there is a time lag.

Therefore, after the obituary of a celebrity is reported, it seems that ethics regarding life and death and awareness of human rights will be questioned depending on what kind of response is taken.

Money is the reason why both the media and YouTuber publish information.

In some celebrity obituary content, you may be able to show off your goodness by suspending profits or donating profits.

However, if it still leads to favorable impressions and attracting customers, and if it is possible to acquire new people on the topic, it is still inseparable from money.

You can also think about what is wrong with getting rewards by adding some value, such as providing the most topics to make viewers remember the deceased or making them think about their lives. increase.

Then it's hard to compare what a funeral director is, what a priest such as a priest or a minister is, and all the professions that are fatal, down to the medical profession.

At the very least, there can be an apology that these people are needed by themselves or their bereaved families.

You will be working and receiving the reward with the consent of the person and the bereaved family.

That's what makes it different from the media and YouTuber.

Then, for example, if the entertainment agency asks the media to tell me the obituary of the talent I belong to, it is not a criticism, which is my personal impression.

In addition, if personal works are rebroadcast by being talked about not only by the media and YouTuber but also by the public, and if money goes into the office to which the person belongs, the juniors who are on the basis of what the person has built will make a leap forward. If the bereaved family also has a small dividend, it seems that it is not different from the person's intention.

I think I should have first firmly defined why it's bad to get money from obituary on this topic, and I should have explained that I used negative expressions such as hyenas and vultures. It is a reflection, but what has become clearer here is that the impression of good and bad will change depending on the strength of the relationship with the person as the basis.

And it is not only the media / YouTuber but also the viewers who judge it.

The standard of ethics, which can be called national character as a whole, will be questioned.