Anxiety and expectations for chat GPT
I don't agree with the explanation about copyright.
Chat GPT is a hot topic these days.
I could write a preface for a thesis, compose a business email, and use natural language that is not mechanical and indistinguishable from humans.
There are still many things I don't fully understand, but at first glance, it's a technology that makes me think that we're in an amazing era.
Now, I was a little skeptical about this chat GPT, which learns a large amount of text information on the Internet and answers human questions. Is it counted as a number?
It seems that information from Wikipedia will also be collected, but that information will be put into the chat GPT database once, and will be sent after understanding it, so it should not be quoted.
However, this sounds somewhat like a hoax.
Even if you understand it yourself, the source of the knowledge will never change, so if you have a system that keeps records like a computer, you should clearly indicate the source of the citation.
Whether it's 100 lines or 1000 lines.
If you correct information on the Internet in your own words and send it, it is nothing more than a so-called indirect quotation.
If you don't cite the source, it's plagiarism.
I don't know if the reason for not citing the source is technically impossible, or if it's technically possible but wants to give priority to the innovative impression of Chat GPT itself, but I think it's the latter.
Also, it says that the copyright belongs to a company called Open AI, the developer of Chat GPT, but if there is a source of citation, I think that the copyright is the source of the citation.
I have the impression that this copyright is also trying to deceive.
It seems to be a huge profit for open AI, but as a citation source, it is a problem that is extremely costly.
By the way, Bing's AI chat is designed to show the source of the quote.
I praised him for doing things that I thought were natural ☺
Then Bing say that "Yes, citing sources is very important. By citing the source, you can increase the credibility of the information. Looking for something else?"
In the past, when there were no internet and few people traveled to Japan, there must have been a lot of plagiarism even in the world of literature and music.
It is a method of selling things that are popular in foreign countries and popular things to people in their own country who don't know anything about them.
Some sort of parasite that weakens with bloggers.
So, my other concern is that even if I get knowledge from a certain chat GPT site, I don't think it will be reflected in affiliate earnings regardless of whether or not the number of visits remains on that site.
It's a machine.
Advertising has no value when accessed by a machine.
If people who write sites and blogs for the purpose of making money like that only get information without receiving advertising fees, I think they won't find the value of continuing.
In the world, bloggers and affiliates are treated as demons like unearned income earners who found a money tree, but I don't think it's always the case.
Some of them are bad people who post plagiarism-like articles that are just copied and pasted and articles with fishing titles that have no substance.
However, there are some that are highly practical sources of information, such as sites that post how to grow vegetables that I often see.
They are not unearned income because they are posting records that they actually raised themselves.
They are working hard.
It takes a lot of effort to put the information together.
If chat GPT makes such information worthless in a sense, bloggers will stop writing articles and affiliates will decline.
Alternatively, bloggers may install programs on their sites to block chat GPT intrusion in order to protect their interests.
In that case, the information that can be presented by chat GPT that has lost its source may become obsolete and become unusable.
I feel that pathogenic bacteria kill their host and die themselves.
So are parasites and cancer.
Advantages of Chat GPT
As such, I am not convinced by the copyright explanation, and I have the impression that Chat GPT is still a bluff technology with a lot of deception hidden in it.
What I thought was amazing, and what I thought was innovative, is that it has the potential to almost completely remove language barriers.
According to the Nikkan Sports article mentioned above, Chat GPT converts questions asked in Japanese into English, collects information after understanding it in English, and returns it to Japanese answers again.
Because the program was written in English, it seems that answering in Japanese is a little more difficult, but it is certain that it straddles languages.
This means that no matter what language you ask, you have the power to bring together information from almost any language.
No, it's still at the stage of possibility, but I think it's pretty amazing.
We search in our own language and can only find answers within the information in our own language.
If you want information from the US or UK, you have to search in English.
Even Wikipedia's content varies by language.
German information was in German and Chinese information was in Chinese, so there was a language barrier.
It was only when there was a site that someone translated into my own language that I was able to obtain information from other countries.
Chat GPT has the potential to freely cross language barriers.
This leap in the amount of information is attractive, and it can be said that it is a splendid technology.
If copyright can be extracted and presented properly instead of being an open AI, I feel that it will be accepted without political pressure or resistance from the economic and academic worlds.
Open AI also needs income, so I'm not saying don't seek profits.
But now I think it's a little greedy and commercial, and the strategy is short-term.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿